• In DMVPN Phase 2 EIGRP Routing, LAN traffic between Chicago and Miami finally took the direct spoke-to-spoke tunnel.
    That result has a cost: every spoke must learn every remote LAN, with the remote spoke set as the next hop.

    Starting Point

    Here is the EIGRP baseline on the hub's Tunnel0 interface:

    • no ip split-horizon eigrp 100

    • no ip next-hop-self eigrp 100

    • No summary route toward the spokes.

    DMVPN Phase 2 starting point for Phase 3: R3 routes 10.40.40.0/24 to next hop 192.168.100.4, so LAN traffic from Chicago to Miami takes the direct spoke-to-spoke tunnel

    Figure 1 – Starting point: direct LAN traffic, one route per remote LAN

    This design works only because Chicago's routing table explicitly names Miami (192.168.100.4) as the next hop.
    Phase 2 depends entirely on the routing protocol to deliver the correct next hop.

    What Phase 3 Changes

    Phase 3 removes that dependency. The routing table can point back to the hub, and NHRP corrects the path dynamically.

    It requires two commands:

    • ip nhrp redirect on the hub: informs a spoke when its traffic hairpins through the hub to reach another spoke.

    • ip nhrp shortcut on each spoke: enables the spoke to act on that message and send subsequent packets directly.

    DMVPN Phase 3 configuration: the hub R1 in New York adds ip nhrp redirect on its mGRE Tunnel0, the spokes R3 Chicago and R4 Miami add ip nhrp shortcut

    Figure 2 – Phase 3: one command on the hub, one on each spoke

    Answer the question below

    Click on Complete to continue